Tuesday, 23 June 2009
Resident Gary G. Wakefield contacts NAAS
Per a previous post, this blogger reported that NAAS officials were receiving unsolicited correspondence from a Gary G. Wakefield, 1850 Isaac, St, in Pahrump, NV. Mr Wakefield claimed he was a person receiving unsolicited correspondence from a person(s) that were using the NAAS mail box number as a return address. although we appreciate the concerns and claims of this consumer, we find the actions of this person rather suspicious. For example, an NAAD DEIA Agent uncovered evidence that an official or representative of the Northwest Association of Accredited Schools made electronic inquiries to the consumer affairs of the United States Postal Service before this post became public.
Furthermore, NAAS officials investigated the claims of Gary G. Wakefield and quickly determined the following:
1. The claims of Gary G. Wakefield are false;
2. The claims of Gary G. Wakefield have no merit;
3. The claims of Gary G. Wakefield have no logical sense, and defy common sense;
4. The claims of Gary G. Wakefield are most likely related to Northwest Association of Accredited Schools, and local persons associated with that entity.
5. The claims of Gary G. Wakefield are most likely related to one or more persons mentioned in an existing NAAS NEWS Media Report(s).
It is unclear, but possible, that Gary G. Wakefield and others may have ties to Northwest Association of Accredited Schools, or other persons mentioned in NAAS NEWS Media reports.
NAAS DEIA Agents have secured electronic and other evidence that ties an official of Northwest Association of Accredited Schools, with activity that is designed to undermine the prestige and character of National Academy of American Scholars (NAAS).
If Mr. Wakefield is reading this notice he should know that it is against NAAS EAS/N2 Rules to send unsolicted correspondence to an NAAS official, and insofar as claims that an NAAS opertaor is sending to him or other persons unsolicited correspondence, that claim is baseless, unsubstantiated, and makes no logical sense. Perhaps Mr. Wakefield should review his call log and check for calls from persons or entities named or mentioned in NAAS Media reports.
Please note: All communication to an NAAS mail boxi is subject to NAAS EAS/N2 Rules. If such communication is either unsolicited, or unrequested, or that comes from a non-NAAS Subscriber, or fails to adhere to proper NAAS protocol, it is also a matter of public record, and may therefore be posted in a public forum.
Monday, 15 June 2009
NAAS Maintenance Issue
Friday, 12 June 2009
NAAS Letter of Protest to USPTO
An official Letter of Protest was sent to United States Patent and Trademark Office via U.S. certified mail detailing the legal case authority why the United Patent and Trademark Office has no alternative but to reject the deceptive, deceitful, and bogus trademark application submitted by Dave Steadman, and his Northwest Association of Accredited Schools.
NAAS NEWS will also be producing a Video Protest against the Trademark application submitted by Northwest Association of Accredited Schools.
The Idaho Dept. of Education has apparently teamed up with a band of criminals. This state agency encourages inferior educational standards for Idaho residents, and is implicitly encouraging Idaho students that it is 'OK' to steal, decieve consumers, and engage in the crime of Trademark Infringement.
It should not be surprising that many consumers believe that National Academy of American Scholars has superior integrity and higher moral standards than the Idaho Dept of Education, and each of the other state education departments that provide funding, free advertising, endorsements, and credibility to Northwest Association of Accredited Schools. After-all, the facts are overwhelming. National Academy of American Scholars supports laws that prohibit Copyright and Trademark infringement, whereas the Idaho Dept. of Education, and their employees, do not respect such U.S. laws.
What more evidence do you need??
Friday, 5 June 2009
NAAS Attorney Advertising Guide
NAAS frowns upon the practice of online advertising by attorneys, and considers the practice to be immoral. Online advertising by attorneys is a red-flag for attorney corruption, and dishonesty. In fact, the greater the online advertising presence then the greater the probabilty the attorney or law firm will be dishonest, and unethical. NAAS DEIA agents have collected information that suggests that attorneys who advertise online are most likely less ethical than their counterparts who do not.
The profession of online attorneys is not much different than used-car salesmen, and the profession of trademark attorneys that adverise online is comparable to the automobile repair industry. As a consumer, client, or potential client, you will face deceit, dishonesty, or incorrect legal advice. for example, consider attorneys or law firms that have purchased an advertising link or sponsored ad on any search engine, including Google, Yahoo, YouTube, or MSN, for the purposes of soliciting business for attorney services. The solicitations range from soliciting business for a trademark application, settling a trademark dispute, or soliting income in exchange for the filing of any document(s) with the U.S. Trademark Office, then your firm may be subject to an NAAS Attorney Review Media report.
NAAS has published a new NAAS media report as part of a collection of NAAS Media reports that relate to a wider media campaign. National Academy of American Scholars (NAAS), its attorneys, investigators, NAAS DEIA agents, are mounting an aggressive multi-media campaign to investigate and prosecute groups and persons who claim or imply affiliation, approval by, and/or accreditation by National Academy of American Scholars (NAAS). The new NAAS media report is aimed at corrupt attorneys, who mistakenly believe, that their professional status is immune from federal laws, and immune from NAAS Media Reports.
If you are an attorney, or employed at a law firm, and you represent a client who is perceived to be violating the intellectual property rights of National Academy of American Scholars, or who is in violation of NAAS EAS/N2 Rules, or you represent a client has chosen to engage National Academy of American Scholars (NAAS) then please be advised that your firm, and each of its employees, process servers, etc., will be subject to NAAS EAS/N2 Rules.
We encourage our readers to read our new report, and report attorney violations to this Publisher. All attorneys who write or communicate to NAAS or any agents, assignees, or affiliates related thereto, and who represent clients other than NAAS, or its agents or affilites, may be subject to an NAAS Attorney Review report.
There is no legal paperwork or document that a U.S. attorney can prepare that will infringe upon or impede the rights guaranteed under the U.S. Constitution. Attorneys that voluntarily choose to engage the sponsor of National Academy of American Scholars, or NAAS products and services, do so knowing that the rules of engagement are NAAS EAS/N2 Rules.
The NAAS.ORG website is based upon and entirely operated pursuant to published NAAS EAS/N2 Rules. We do not operate based upon some imaginary or hastily created rule, procedure, or demand authored by some U.S. attorney that is designed to benefit his/her client(s), or competitors to NAAS products, and services; such demands constitute moral turpitude and may be reported to the prosecuting State Bar.
NAAS Policy Preference is No U.S. Mail
We receive a tremendous amount of interest for NAAS products and services. The NAAS.ORG website is equipped to facilitate and handle e-commerce requests and dispense orders 24 hours per day unless notified otherwise per NAAS EAS/N2 Rules.
However, demands or communications for NAAS products and services via the U.S. mail may strain our resources. Consequently, we wish to re-emphasize that we prefer online orders. We incorporate a U.S. mailing address on our website for information purposes. Only NAAS Subscribers may submit certified or special delivery documents to NAAS.
Even if an NAAS DEIA Agent accepts or signs for a certified package sent via U.S. Certified mail, that act is not meant to be construed as an obligation to open, assess, review, and act upon any request or inquiry that may be contained therein; such corrpondences may never be opened or read if not accompanied by a special NAAS Code that can only be obtained by completing an online NAAS form, or by being an NAAS Subscriber.